Krafthaus Sign in

Workflow App Sprint Category

Support Routing Gate

For support, CX, and product teams that need consistent routing before queues move, owners change, or policy outcomes are applied.

Likely buyerFounder, CX lead, support operations lead, product lead
Outcomemore consistent routing
Timeline7-10 day implementation sprint

The workflow

Where this breaks today.

Messy path

Current failure mode

Support routing depends on inconsistent macros, scattered policy notes, queue owner judgment, and missing evidence.

Krafthaus

Focused app surface

A ticket intake, routing rulebook, Decision Record, and support handoff that returns route, escalate, request evidence, approve, or block.

Decide

Runtime or record layer

Binding mode: direct_rulebook. Customer executable rulebooks are outside the current production contract.

Example boundary

What the app decides or hands off.

Input Sample intake

Ticket includes customer tier, issue type, SLA risk, refund or cancel request, evidence, confidence, current owner, and missing-input state.

Output Sample result

Route, escalate, request more evidence, approve, block, or assign owner before the queue changes state.

Business case Why this is worth paying for

Repeated routing mistakes create escalations, inconsistent customer outcomes, SLA risk, and avoidable support cost.

What ships

One useful workflow surface, not a broad project.

01Workflow map

Trigger, current path, owner, failure modes, and the boundary where work should proceed, block, review, or route.

02Intake contract

Required fields, evidence standard, missing-input states, and examples of acceptable requests.

03Rulebook or record path

Direct declarative Rulebook v1, trusted-adapter fact contract, or Decision Record-only path depending on the workflow.

04Demoable app surface

A focused Krafthaus page, notary, packet builder, score, dashboard row, or handoff artifact the team can review.

05Decision Record handoff

What gets stored, where the record travels, and who or what receives the next action.

06Expansion path

What to automate, measure, or turn into repeat runtime usage after the first workflow proves useful.

Trust boundary

Start with metadata and handoff shape.

Runs on ticket metadata first. Full customer history and private conversation logs are not needed for the first sprint.

Scope

One workflow

The sprint deliberately avoids broad AI transformation, platform rebuilds, or customer executable rulebooks.

Data

Metadata first

The first sprint can use request metadata, policy fields, evidence status, owner, risk, and desired handoff before private-system integration.

Ask

15-minute review

The low-friction next step is to confirm the workflow owner, required inputs, Decide binding, and whether a Krafthaus surface is worth scoping.

Workflow App Sprint

Map your version of Support Routing Gate.

Use this category as the public pattern. The company-specific artifact comes after the workflow is real enough to review.